The U.S. Supreme Court just keeps getting weirder and weirder! Their strange reasoning of recent years even applies to issues we don't even think about that much - such as suing the Postal Service.
Yesterday, the court ruled that you can't sue the Postal Service even when it intentionally refuses to deliver mail. This ruling stemmed from a Texas case in which a woman alleged that her local post office was practicing racial discrimination by refusing to deliver her mail. Tenants in a property she owned missed important mail as a result, and some even moved out because they weren't getting their mail.
A federal law already inexplicably shielded the Postal Service from lawsuits when they accidentally lose or ruin mail - which happens a lot, as anyone who reads online message forums for collectors knows. Now - even more inexplicably - the court has unilaterally expanded this protection to "the intentional nondelivery of mail."
If the Postal Service can deliberately withhold mail, then where's the accountability? How are people supposed to get their missing mail? Now the Postal Service can just stick out their tongue, put their fingers in their ears, and say, "Reindeer motion, reindeer motion, nyeh!" There's no longer any remedy for losing mail on purpose.