CNN has become the latest fake news outlet to be blackballed as a source by this blog.
Dayton, Ohio, gunman Connor Betts not only made pro-Trump Twitter posts, but some of his former high school classmates said he had extreme right-wing views. After this was revealed, Heavy.com - a so-called news aggregator that accepts submissions from unvetted sources - claimed Betts had actually supported progressive causes and candidates on his Twitter feed. But there is no real evidence of it. All Heavy.com provided was what it claimed were screenshots of the feed.
Heavy.com is not a reliable source. Think of what one of those checkout lane tabloids would be like if it didn't have its own writers practicing yellow journalism and blindly accepted items from outside writers instead.
Later, the website of a certain cable channel had an article with a headline blaring, "The Dayton shooter had an extreme left Twitter feed." The article also referred to what it called "the violent protest group Antifa." It cited the debunked Heavy.com piece as its only source.
What right-wing cable channel ran this discredited garbage? Fox News? CNBC? Nope! It was CNN. CNN actually ran a made-up story that not only claimed that a right-wing mass shooter was actually a leftist but also that Antifa is a "violent protest group." This despite the fact that Antifa has never initiated any violent confrontations. They ran this story even after people who knew the shooter provided information that completely contradicted it.
However, CNN's article goes on to say of Betts's Twitter feed, "The account is no longer active." Gee, ya think? Weird how nobody can verify what's on an account that no longer exists.
CNN used to have much higher standards than this, but I never placed all my faith in CNN anyway. Even in the 1991 Gulf War, when CNN was widely praised for its coverage, the channel scrutinized its coverage to appease political leaders who bullied the media into suppressing negative information about the war. Hiding negative stories isn't what journalism is supposed to stand for, but a lot of media outlets were guilty of it.
Plus, I don't know any leftists who make lists of classmates they want to rape, or kill family members because they associate with people of another race.
This is like how the media claimed the Unabomber was a progressive activist - even though his rambling manifesto repeatedly attacked "liberals."
The media lying about Antifa and various news events shouldn't be a big focus of this blog - but it is, because the media keeps lying. Nobody else calls them out, because they're the media, dammit. Yep, the same media that claims Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction in 2003 and that we have the best economy in 50 years. That media.
Now other media outlets are actually claiming that El Paso shooter Patrick Crusius is a leftist. This claim is even easier to debunk than the media's idiotic claims about Betts, because it can be verified that Crusius posted a manifesto expressing white supremacist views and echoing Donald Trump's stances against immigration. Plus, it turns out that the gunman in the recent shooting in Gilroy, California, promoted a favorite far-right book - a fact that has been almost completely ignored by the media.
Mass shootings are a right-wing phenomenon. End of story.
Fuck off, CNN.
Tuesday, August 6, 2019
CNN lies about Antifa and Ohio massacre
Posted by Bandit at 10:54 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Sad what has become of my country, the media in particular..
ReplyDeleteCNN sounds like the GCP group which is full of right wing spam from Dumbass Deron Alan and Andy Busch.. The Enquirer worshipping robots spammed the same Heavy.com article at least THREE times after it was discredited..
They didn't use another source because there is no other source.. If it was true, IT WOULD HAVE COME OUT BY THEN instead of taking 24 hours for Heavy.com to get it!!
The FCC used to have very strict requirements to work for a radio or television station.. You even had to know morse code by heart.. Too bad that now they have no requirements at all, and any idiot cam just become a journalist because they were in the Young Republicans or whatever (cf. there was a guy on ABC like this, forget his name)
The guy on ABC might be John Karl. I remember posting here that ABC hired him after he completed a course that trained conservatives for the news business.
Delete