Saturday, May 23, 2009

South Carolina guv: Laws? What laws?

Let's suppose you're the governor of your state. And let's suppose the legislature passed a law requiring you to do something you disagreed with. What would you do?

Why, you'd probably obey the law.

But that's because you're not Gov. Mark Sanford of South Carolina - a big Republican. He thinks laws are just (to use Bush's words) "damn pieces of paper."

Recently, South Carolina lawmakers passed a law directing Sanford to ask for stimulus money to soften school budget woes.

But Sanford has announced that he's going to ignore this new law.

Lovely. South Carolina has a governor who not only breaks laws but brags about it in plain sight.

What's more, the law is needed to avoid firing teachers and raising college tuition. So by disobeying the law, Mark Sanford isn't even acting in the public's interests!

Can't they impeach him?

This follows Sanford filing a frivolous lawsuit against the legislature because it dared to override his veto of this law.

Mark Sanford has truly established himself as one of the biggest clowns in American politics today.

(Source: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/breaking/story/740168.html;
http://www.wistv.com/Global/story.asp?S=10389561&nav=0RaPa9u0)

7 comments:

  1. Tim, does South Carolina's constitution call for the executive branch to be separate from the legislative branch? If so, the legislature can't order the governor to do something.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Separation of powers doesn't give the governor the right to break the law.

    ReplyDelete
  3. By that thinking, all he has to do is issue an executive order for the legislature to repeal that law and any other laws he doesn't like.

    ReplyDelete
  4. No. He cannot.

    Did you ever study political science in college? I did.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Funny you should ask. I majored in political science, and yes, I took high-level constitutional law.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Then how is the South Carolina legislature breaking the law? It isn't.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It is presumably violating the state's constitution, if the constitution separates the legislative and executive branch of government.

    ReplyDelete