White supremacist record thief wins Senate election

If you told me that, say, Droopy the Dog could be elected to the Senate, I might say, "Well, maybe."

But Scott "Records" Brown?

Alright, so we know he cheated. I get it. Anyone who's read my work for more than a microsecond gets it. The Republicans have become almost synonymous with cheating. (In addition to the pre-filled ballots discussed earlier, Massachusetts also uses Diebold machines.)

Is it just my imagination, or did Democratic support drop right when Ron Wyden decided to open his stupid mouth about pseudoephedrine? The DLC had to keep right on flapping about that, didn't they?

Does Scott "Records" Brown winning confirm a belief held by many that Republicans are most dangerous right after suffering their biggest defeats (like those of 2006 and 2008)? Of course not. When Record Man kills health care reform, everyone will know the Republicans are the party of no - more so than the Democrats have been, which says a lot, considering their own refusal to pass health care. And that'll be the end of Record Man mania.

We shouldn't have to find out though. Brown's ongoing threats of violence are criminal conduct, and that alone is grounds for the Senate not to seat him. They waited months to seat Al Franken, even though Franken committed no crime. So why should they seat a criminal scumbag like Record Man?

Another reason not to seat Record Man? He cheated. Since when has that been not enough of a reason?