Friday, February 27, 2026

Have no fear, the March ish is here!

March into March with the latest issue of The Last Word!

This ish talks about my failed attempt to see my FBI file, Spectrum's hang-up phone calls, the amazing feces-detecting drone, how the Nazis inspired Social Security cuts, and more!

So point your pooper here...

https://www.scribd.com/document/1004561897/The-Last-Word-3-2026

If that doesn't work, scoot on over here...

http://bunkerblast.info/lastword/lw2603.pdf

Wednesday, February 25, 2026

Supreme Court rules you can't sue Postal Service

The U.S. Supreme Court just keeps getting weirder and weirder! Their strange reasoning of recent years even applies to issues we don't even think about that much - such as suing the Postal Service.

Yesterday, the court ruled that you can't sue the Postal Service even when it intentionally refuses to deliver mail. This ruling stemmed from a Texas case in which a woman alleged that her local post office was practicing racial discrimination by refusing to deliver her mail. Tenants in a property she owned missed important mail as a result, and some even moved out because they weren't getting their mail.

A federal law already inexplicably shielded the Postal Service from lawsuits when they accidentally lose or ruin mail - which happens a lot, as anyone who reads online message forums for collectors knows. Now - even more inexplicably - the court has unilaterally expanded this protection to "the intentional nondelivery of mail."

If the Postal Service can deliberately withhold mail, then where's the accountability? How are people supposed to get their missing mail? Now the Postal Service can just stick out their tongue, put their fingers in their ears, and say, "Reindeer motion, reindeer motion, nyeh!" There's no longer any remedy for losing mail on purpose.

Monday, February 9, 2026

March for Billionaires draws fives of people

On Saturday, there was a pro-billionaire march in San Francisco that drew a few five people.

Seriously, the March for Billionaires - yes, it actually was called that - had more reporters than participants. Even the San Francisco Chronicle counted only about 3 dozen marchers, and other sources say there were no more than 12.

Why was there an event like this in the first place? The entire point of it was to protest against a proposed referendum in California that would impose a onetime tax on billionaires. Marchers weren't deterred by the laughably low turnout and spouted typical right-wing bullshit when asked about their stance by reporters.

Organizers on Bluesky whined about how rough life is for billionaires. The event's page boo-hooed, "Billionaires get a bad rap. But most of them make our lives much better." The march featured a huge banner that said, "Billionaires build prosperity. Keep them in California!" Another sign said, "Billionaires build the future."

About the only person listening to these clowns is Gavin Newsom. Newsom says that if voters approve the referendum to enact a tax on billionaires, he will ignore the result and veto it.