Sunday, January 18, 2009

Court-packing? ('Pail Poll)

Last week's 'Pail Poll is now closed, and it asked which option would be better for restoring sanity to America's airwaves. According to the final tally, 6 of you voted to restore ownership caps; 4 of you voted to revive the Fairness Doctrine.

The latest 'Pail Poll asks whether the Obama administration should institute court-packing of the Supreme Court.

Court-packing would allow him to appoint more Justices than the usual 9 who make up the court. It would serve the purpose of canceling the influence of existing Justices.

After the rogue Bush regime got to appoint 2 of the most patently disastrous Justices in modern history, what do you think? Bush's Justices are among several who have consistently thumbed their noses at constitutional law in favor of their own personal whims.

FDR proposed court-packing to combat a Supreme Court that was also quite questionable. Should Obama do the same?

No comments:

Post a Comment