Saturday, August 7, 2010

Google censors newsgroup

Since this is a day ending in 'y', it means Google fucked up at something. And this story so clearly points to a conspiracy that one wonders why no other blogs have picked it up.

Google Groups once carried misc.health.alternative - just as it purports to carry all the other countless newsgroups that are out there. But this week, I read that Google dropped this group and gave users this message: "The group named misc.health.alternative has been removed because it violated Google's Terms Of Service."

I thought this had to be just a misunderstanding - until I tried looking for this group on Google and found it was true. Google has deleted this group from its supposedly "complete" Usenet archives and from its Google Groups service.

Google doesn't specify how a group about alternative medicine violates its terms of service. For one thing, it's not a Google group. It's a Usenet group, and Usenet is not owned by anybody, let alone Google. For another, how can the subject matter possibly violate its terms?

Supposedly, Google started blocking this group as a warning to one of its users who allegedly violated Google rules. In other words, one person abused it, so Google blocked everybody else. That's like if the highway department closes an entire road because one person runs a stop sign. So I don't believe that was the reason. No sirree!

I believe with almost 100% certainty that Google blocked this group because drug companies wanted it blocked due to its subject matter. I'm convinced of it. After Google yanked this blog's AdSense account because of its political views, what other conclusion is there?

At the same time, however, Google carries newsgroups that are designed only as attack groups and don't have a shred of redeeming value. Google even carries groups that were founded to defame specific individuals who aren't even public figures.

To sum up, we can say with near-certainty that Google deleted an alternative medicine group just because Big Pharma told it to. That's what Google has stooped to.

29 comments:

  1. As if corporate medicine isn't.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. People actually pay for corporate medicine, so no, it isn't.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Translation: Corporations are getting rich off of it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. And you are not rich because you, unlike corporations, do not contribute to society.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "The Far Right went absolutely bugfuck ballistic when I went on my Mid-South fact-finding mission around New Year's.They hate it when I do this. Just HATE it! Even if it's in a conservative region of the country such as the South."


    Don't flatter yourself. Nobody knows who you are.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "One person (me) kept their entire movement out of the county. And of all the counties for this to happen."

    HAHAHA. Egotistical imbecile.

    ReplyDelete
  8. As if you've ever contributed a damn thing.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm not a failure of a person. That's something.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Incidentally, how do corporations contribute?

    ReplyDelete
  11. They produce a product people buy (unlike you.) With the money they expand and create jobs (unlike you.) They innovate and invest in R@D, (unlike you.) They are successful (Unlike LeftMaps.)

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Since 1993, I have published a populist newsletter and have been involved in populist causes."

    The stimulus bill was opposed by the populace. So you as a "populist" must oppose it too, right?

    ReplyDelete
  13. "What a stupid argument."

    Can't respond to my "unlike you" post? What's the matter? Left wing baby crying? Wahhhhhhhhh. You don't have any sort of dignity or self respect.

    ReplyDelete
  14. "Always look on the bright side of losing elections, Chris."

    Instead he should look on the bright side of winning them.

    ReplyDelete
  15. You should be some sort of bookie or something. You said both Brown and Christie would lose.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "ecause I've joined several Facebook groups designed to counter the War on Drugs propagandists, the drug warriors have asked me why a working guy like me - who probably had to take a drug test for work - opposes drug tests for unemployed welfare recipients"

    You don't work.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Your genitals don't work. Mankind's genepool thanks you for that. They must have been disabled after one too many Friday nights alone.

    ReplyDelete
  18. That's your comeback? "I've written a book no one reads! yay!"

    ReplyDelete
  19. To repeat: So where's your book, Gufus?

    ReplyDelete
  20. The People want Dominic to write a book.

    ReplyDelete
  21. It looks like misc.health.alternative is back online. I guess Google got caught with its pants down.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Yeah, "Dominic" where's your book?

    ReplyDelete
  23. That settles it. Dominic owes us a book. The People expect it to be on bookstore shelves by Plop Day, so get to work.

    ReplyDelete