Thursday, October 28, 2010

War criminals running for Congress

After the fascist media tried to normalize war crimes by openly promoting Lynndie England's whiny book, it should be little surprise that at least 2 current Republican candidates for Congress are war criminals themselves.

This article provides a glimpse of North Carolina's Ilario Pantano and Florida's Allen West - both of whom are war criminals:

http://www.pensitoreview.com/2010/10/28/nc07-gop-t-candidate-who-shot-two-unarmed-iraqis-60-times-likely-to-be-elected-to-congress-next-week

West pleaded guilty to assaulting a prisoner in Iraq and was forced to retire by the Army. Pantano, a former Marine, murdered 2 Iraqis who he knew were unarmed.

In all honesty, I don't think either Pantano or West will be elected, but that's not the point here. What's amazing is that the Republicans expect us to abide by laws passed by war criminals.

The GOP can go gag on a turd if they think I'm going to obey laws that violent war criminals passed. So don't fuck with me, Rethugs. For the Republicans, this election can end either badly or very badly. If they want to push their luck, that's their problem.

27 comments:

  1. Allen West is a war criminal for trying to get information out of a detainee about an imminent attack on American troops, by INTIMIDATING him? Not even hurting him?

    http://elections.nytimes.com/2010/house/florida/22

    ReplyDelete
  2. http://elections.nytimes.com/2010/house/florida/8, too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You seem to like Taliban Dan an awfully lot. Is he your boyfriend?

    ReplyDelete
  4. And I thought I was the one who hated gay people. Nope. Your tears on November 3 will be delicious.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "but it's pretty clear Coakley is going to win,"


    HAHAHAHA

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm not the person here who supports Taliban Dan. So you're obviously the bigot here.

    ReplyDelete
  7. And how is he bigoted? Because some fat moron who's going out this November said so?

    ReplyDelete
  8. They did it again about an hour ago. This time, $40 was taken. I called the cops; they looked at it for 2 minutes and didn't investigate.


    Hee hee hee.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "Is he your boyfriend?"

    Normally this would not be appropriate..but in this case, it is..

    When you're talking to somebody like Rufus or Talibanny Danny (who are on record as being antigay), an insult like this is perfectly appropriate.

    I can assure you Bandit doesn't have bigoted views towards ANYONE. Rufus (Dominic) has crossed a line here many MANY times.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "I can assure you Bandit doesn't have bigoted views towards ANYONE. Rufus (Dominic) has crossed a line here many MANY times. "

    What line? Have you ever seen what this guy writes? No insult against a Republican is unfair. He called the Contract with American "totalitarian fascism". Does he even believe what he says?

    ReplyDelete
  11. He calls the 94 elections the "America-hating wave of 1994."

    He has no standards. He should be ridiculed for the cretinous failure he is.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Have I seen what Bandit writes?? I've known him for ten years..

    And get a clue Ru..the Contract with America is totalitarian fascism.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "And get a clue Ru..the Contract with America is totalitarian fascism. "


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_with_America#The_Fiscal_Responsibility_Act

    Name one provision that would be either totalitarian or fascist.

    ReplyDelete
  14. A cretinous failure eh?? You haven't been back to Dayton in awhile, i take it..

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  16. A "cretinous failure" would have never gotten a dangerous right-wing cult with 4 branches in 3 states shut down. (Granted, I was only one member of a group of protesters, but the point stands.)

    ReplyDelete
  17. A "cretinous failure" would have never gotten a dangerous right-wing cult with 4 branches in 3 states shut down. (Granted, I was only one member of a group of protesters, but the point stands.)


    Citation please. You're probably just deluding yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I'd like to apologize to the readers of this blog for a remark I made earlier, in case anybody was offended - other than Rufus, that is.

    Believe me, I will not condone discrimination in any form. If I condoned it, I wouldn't have started a blog like this. In fact, I believe gay marriage should be legalized - and I don't give a damn what some "values voters" thought 5 years ago.

    The user who said Rufus has crossed a line many times here is right. I only felt that it was suitable to respond to Rufus in kind, considering that he lends his support to bigoted politicians.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  20. "readers of this blog"

    Me, that dumb broad, and scheffbd. And you act lik you're giving some grand announcement.

    "I only felt that it was suitable to respond to Rufus in kind, considering that he lends his support to bigoted politicians."

    Bigoted is defined solely as "I don't like them".

    ReplyDelete
  21. Dumbinic, you accuse Bandit of bigotry over a comment that's nothing worse than you'd hear in the average bar fight, yet you refer to women as "dumb broads".

    I don't usually post here but you're a shining example of why the Repukes should just disappear themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  22. "Dumbinic"


    Ohhhh clever. I say he's hateful not because of some antigay slur, but because his posts over the years, long before I came on, show a disturbing picture of simply referring to political opponents as subhuman fascists. He said Republicans should be jailed and executed for welfare reform.

    And I didn't call women dumb broads. I called a woman a dumb broad. Which is another thing people call each other in bar fights.

    "Repukes"

    Again clever. The jackass who runs this site is far more hateful then me. I never called for the executions of my political foes.


    And if I disappeared, my tax money would disappear, forcing the government to cut welfare spending, therefore forcing you to get a job and be productive. If you actually had some intelligence and self-reliance, you'd become a Republican, therefore nullifying the effects of your wish.

    ReplyDelete
  23. HEY STUPID DUMBINIC...Bandit didn't even make any anti-gay slurs. You'd know that if you actually READ what he said.

    If you can't handle being insulted in a bar fight, don't start fights in bars, DUMBINIC.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Rufus lies again. I never advocated executing members of Congress over welfare "reform." But I absolutely believe they should be put on trial for crimes against humanity - and hopefully given very stiff prison terms.

    Welfare "reform" has probably killed more Americans than can ever be counted.

    ReplyDelete